Thank you for your kind and valuable comments. Regarding the Fabians, I find it challenging to determine where to begin. It is important to establish that they are closely connected to various organizations, as well as political and charitable institutions, which have been subjects of public concern, particularly over the past four years. The primary objective of the Fabians has consistently been to infuse socialist ideas into the Liberal and Conservative parties. Additionally, they have organized the separate Labour Representation Committee, which subsequently evolved into the Labour Party. The current Marxist Labour government in the United Kingdom is predominantly composed of members of the Fabian Society( approx 90%). Similar affiliations can be observed in other parliamentary parties, including the Greens and the Liberal Democrats, as well as among the leaders of numerous other political parties(incl. official “opposition” ).
In addition to the national Fabian society, there exists a significant number of local Fabian societies, whose members often hold positions of authority within local councils or organizations associated with these councils.
I am including a link to some interesting information regarding the Fabians’ obsession on controlling the global economy. https://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=FabianSociety&C=7.0 PS. The well-known Klaus Schwab words, “You’ll own nothing and be happy,” were originally articulated by Herbert George Wells (in his book which discusses the aspirations and strategies of the Fabians in pursuit of their sociopathic objective of a New World Order.)
The book is, in Wells’s words, a "scheme to thrust forward and establish a human control over the destinies of life and liberate it from its present “dangers, uncertainties and miseries.” It proposes that largely as the result of scientific progress, a common vision of a world “politically, socially and economically unified” is emerging among educated and influential people, and that this can be the basis of “a world revolution aiming at universal peace, welfare and happy activity” that can result in the establishment of a “world commonweal.” This is to be achieved by “drawing together a proportion of all or nearly all the functional classes in contemporary communities in order to weave the beginnings of a world community out of their selection.” This will ultimately “be a world religion.”
